Skip to content
  • Catalogue
  • Dictionary of Irish Architects
  • Catalogue
  • Dictionary of Irish Architects
Menu

Menu

Report on Belfast Urban Motorway

Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.) for Ministry of Development and Belfast Corporation

February 1967

Printed report

IAA 90/40

Building for Transport V: Roads

Report on Belfast Urban Motorway

Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.) for Ministry of Development and Belfast Corporation

February 1967

Printed report

IAA 90/40

The impact of the automobile on Ireland is a phenomenon which played out with increasing intensity in the decades after the Second World War. By the start of the 1960s, traffic volumes were so high in many towns and cities, and congestion so severe, that various reports were commissioned to identify solutions. In 1961 the German transport expert Karl-Heinz Schaechterle was appointed to produce a traffic report for Dublin Corporation. His 1965 General Traffic Plan for Dublin advocated inter alia an outer ring dual-carriageway on the routes of the Grand and Royal Canals. A traffic plan was also produced for Cork while in September 1964 Belfast Corporation approved in principle the Belfast Urban Motorway Scheme. Two-and-a-half years later, this detailed plan by R. Travers Morgan & Partners was published. It delineates the optimal route and necessary infrastructure for a ‘bold and imaginative’ elevated inner ring road, six to eight lanes wide, connecting via five major interchanges to a network of radial motorways. The motorway scheme was further elaborated in a second report by the same consultants, the Belfast Transportation Plan, in 1969.

The Urban Motorway Plan suggested that within a decade of its publication, by 1976, the motorway it delineated would be complete. However, even without the impact of the Troubles, which the consultants could be excused for not anticipating, the logistics and costs of the undertaking were such that the proposed time frame was entirely unrealistic. Half the Urban Motorway was eventually built. The rest is unlikely now to materialise, while accommodating the impact of the completed section continues to present challenges.

Turn Again

There is a map of the city which shows the bridge that was never built.

A map which shows the bridge that collapsed; the streets that never existed.

Ireland’s Entry, Elbow Lane, Weigh-House Lane, Back Lane, Stone-Cutter’s Entry –

Today’s plan is already yesterday’s – the streets that were there are gone.

And the shape of the jails cannot be shown for security reasons.

 

The linen backing is falling apart – the Falls Road hangs by a thread.

When someone asks me where I live, I remember where I used to live.

Someone asks me for directions, and I think again. I turn into

A side street to try to throw off my shadow, and history is changed.

 

Ciaran Carson

By kind permission of the author’s Estate and The Gallery Press, Loughcrew, Co. Meath

From Collected Poems: Volume One (2023)

Ringing Belfast

Mark Hackett

In1967 the engineering consultants R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.) published their Report on Belfast Urban Motorway. They followed this in 1969 with their Belfast Transport Plan. Taken together, the two volumes are a culmination of road plans for Belfast that evolved from the late 1950s following visits by officials to study the American interstate road system. Beautifully produced, the hardbacked volumes belie the structural violence they represent, a violence that continues to blight the lives of current city residents. Particularly striking in the volumes are the lines of the raised motorway laid over the canvas of old city maps, but there is no analysis or sense of the city that Belfast was, how it worked and how the motorway would change it. One also cannot fail to correlate the publication dates with both the emergence of the Civil Rights movement and the first unrest of the conflict that erupted in August 1969, often on the paths being cleared for urban road schemes.

 

A seminal work on urbanism from this time, and one directly relevant to the Belfast condition, The Death and Life of Great American Cities was published by Jane Jacobs in 1961. Jacobs eloquently attacks the interstate road projects of urban planner Robert Moses in New York and gives clear voice to a practical and iterative urbanism, thinking that endures today. None of her critique seems to have entered the consciousness of the Belfast planners or road engineers.

 

The path for the first phase of the Belfast motorway had already been cleared when Ron Wiener published his 1975 book The Rape and Plunder of the Shankill. Community Action: The Belfast Experience (26.1) Wiener lived in and studied the Shankill area, documenting the effects of redevelopment for the Belfast urban motorway project in a study that has become renowned in urban sociology. As Wiener explains, in 1956 areas of housing ‘slums’ were designated around central Belfast. This led to hastened decline in the decade leading up to the conflict, as landlord owners knew they would be compensated for housing to be demolished and so had no motivation to repair or maintain the existing stock. The designated areas became hollowed out, a background for the sweeping curves of the motorway that can be seen in the Travers Morgan volumes (26.2).

Photograph of hte front cover of a book entitled 'The Rape and Plunder of the Shankill. by Ron Wiener, which was published in Belfast in 1975.
26.1 Ron Wiener, The Rape and Plunder of the Shankill. Community Action: The Belfast Experience (Belfast, 1975) (IAA 2026/4)
Photomontage of proposed M4 Interchange from the 1967 Travers Morgan & Partners Report on Belfast Urban Motorway.
26.2 R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Report on Belfast Urban Motorway (Belfast, 1967). ‘Photomontage of M4 Interchange’

Northern Ireland had benefited from post Second World War reform in education and from the introduction of the National Health Service, but progress in housing and urban repair was slow. The Stormont government and Belfast Corporation were unmotivated to build housing based on need. Housing was, in part, linked to gerrymandering in the voting system within what was effectively a single-party state. Belfast was seen by those in political power, with their regional and rural interests, as a dense and troublesome city with a large working class. There was a desire to deconstruct Belfast, to curb its economic power, and this inherent tension between city and regional governance continues to play out today. Belfast is a city that for seven decades has not held the levers to manage itself, nor has it retained a cohesive civic identity to argue effectively for its own urbanism.

 

New approach roads to the city were being progressed in the post-war era and the need to connect these expanded into the emerging plan for a ring of urban motorways first which was mooted in 1960-61. While there was certainly some need to make a connection between the approach roads and Belfast Docks, and a parallel requirement for new city bridges, these immediate and achievable objectives became tied up in the grand urban motorway scheme. The motorway became the predetermined element in the Robert Matthew’s 1963 Regional Survey and Plan for Belfast which outlined a network of growth towns and new industry connected by roads. A rational alignment of regional motorways would have placed key interchanges well outside the city. Instead, and ironically, for a decentralisation proposal, the motorways were to link in a loop tightly knotted around central Belfast (26.3).

Map showing ‘The Preferred Route’ from the 1967 R. Travers Morgan & Partners Report on Belfast Urban Motorway
26.3 R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Report on Belfast Urban Motorway (Belfast, 1967). ‘The Preferred Route’
Map entiteld ‘Method of Working 1986’ from the 1969 R. Travers Morgan & Partners Belfast Transport Plan.
26.4 R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Belfast Transport Plan (Belfast, 1969). ‘Method of Working 1986’

Just as destructive as the motorway itself was the plan for distributor and ring roads for the remaining central city (26.4). These caused a ‘double cut’ in the urban fabric, leaving long ‘shatter-zones’ devoid of any street activity or use. Arterial routes were to become clear-ways and the swathes of redevelopment land, mostly held by government, became commuter car parking, forming a ‘grey doughnut’, around a disconnected city centre. And that centre, the commercial heart of Belfast, was abandoned by the middle class, the critical population who might have argued for the city.

 

Road enthusiasts may consider that the conflict prevented the full delivery of the plans but, in reality, it was only due to the conflict that finance was found to partially implement it. Realising the ambitions of the Travers Morgan plans was certainly not within the capability of the Northern Ireland of the late 1960s, which was struggling to address so many issues and was caught between asking for aid from Britain and resisting the reforms which were being requested in return. As the urban discord intensified, British government security minutes from 1970 noted the benefits of using the motorway and the proposed inner ring road to create a ‘cordon sanitaire’ to physically isolate the north and west of Belfast, poorer areas where the conflict was most intense. Indeed, such a move seems implicit from the first ‘slum’ designations and plans of the 1950s. Little surprise then that the roads department became the most powerful and well resourced branch of the 1972-98 Direct Rule government. Roads it turns out, are a most effective tool to divide and control citizens within cities.

 

The impact of the Oil Crisis, coupled with building inflation and the urban conflict, did stop the work on the motorway for a time. A 1977 Public Inquiry on the paused project did approve the west section but as a downgraded, sunken dual carriageway, the Westlink. In hindsight, the original Travers Morgan raised motorway option would have caused less urban severance (26.5). The Westlink was only partly sunken, its undulating slip road interchanges, waste sites and drainage causing great disturbance to what were once arterial streets.

 

The Westlink and the river crossing legs of the motorway were completed in 1983 and 1993 respectively. The southern and eastern sections were eventually abandoned, a logic that diagrams hint was known at the time (26.6). The crucial connecting link or interchange for three regional motorways in North Belfast remains unrealised. Instead, the most important motorway junction in the region has been left for over forty years as a street level, traffic-light controlled junction. The current project to remove the traffic lights may only be completed in 2036, a full seventy-five years on from its first design, assuming they are removed at all.

Photomontage of Elevated Motorway’ showing Clifton Street looking toward Carlisle Memorial Church) from the 1967 R. Travers Morgan & Partners Report on Belfast Urban Motorway.
26.5 R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Report on Belfast Urban Motorway (Belfast, 1967). ‘Photomontage of Elevated Motorway’ (Clifton Street, looking toward Carlisle Memorial Church)
Map entitled ‘South Leg, Red Route’ from the 1967 R. Travers Morgan & Partners Report on Belfast Urban Motorway.
26.6 R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Report on Belfast Urban Motorway (Belfast, 1967). ‘South Leg, Red Route’

Rather than serve the city the roads have stymied it, and one of the flaws, apparent in the Travers Morgan analysis, was how regional motorway traffic was to mix with inter-city and commuter traffic. The Travers Morgan transportation plan undermined the case for public and rapid transport options following the loss of the city tram system, gone by 1954. It is notable that the 1977 Public Inquiry gave the go-ahead for the Westlink on condition that public transport was installed. Belfast finally opened one line of a bus rapid transit scheme some four decades later.

The Travers Morgan reports seemed impressive at the time they were published, and they certainly helped garner power and resources to advance a roads agenda dominance that still endures. They are Robert Moses repeated two decades later with no Jane Jacobs, or other effective civic voice, to resist. In the end, the desire to cater for the ‘present symbol of prosperity  – the motor car’ (R. Travers Morgan & Partners (N. I.), Report on Belfast Urban Motorway (Belfast, 1967) 11), aligned with class division, and the sense of fear that occurred during the conflict. We are left with the lines of motorway overlaid on the old city maps. As Ciaran Carson wrote in Turn Again, ‘the streets that were there are gone’.

 

Mark Hackett is a Belfast based architect specialising in urban issues, social and cultural buildings.

 

Back to main Pivot Points page.

Donate

Large or small, every donation helps secure the future of the collection. We are truly grateful for your support.

Donate now

Donate

Large or small, every donation helps secure the future of the collection. We are truly grateful for your support.

Donate now

Follow us

  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Linkedin

Address

45 Merrion Sq.
Dublin 2
D02 VY60

Contact

01 663 3040
info@irisharchitecturalarchive.ie

English | As Gaeilge

  • English

Opening Hours

Reading Room

10am-5pm, Tuesdays to Fridays; Mondays by appointment

Exhibitions

10am-5pm, Mondays to Fridays

Newsletter

Stay in touch, receive updates about exhibitions and events

Subscribe

English | As Gaeilge

Menu
  • Catalogue
  • Dictionary of Irish Architects
  • About Us
    • About
    • Board
    • Members
    • Staff
    • Annual Reports
    • Contact
  • Our Collections
    • Collections
    • Online Catalogue
  • Our Exhibitions
    • Current Exhibitions
    • Past Exhibitions
  • Our Building
    • No. 45 Merrion Square
    • Venue Hire
  • Access
    • Visit
    • Reading Room
  • Support us
    • Donate
    • Major Sponsors
Search this site

Subscribe

* indicates required

The Irish Architectural Archive will use the information you provide on this form to send you its regular Newsletter. Please confirm that you would like to hear from us:

You can change your mind at any time by clicking the unsubscribe link in the footer of any email you receive from us, or by contacting us at info@iarc.ie. We will treat your information with respect. By clicking below, you agree that we may process your information in accordance with these terms.

We use Mailchimp as our marketing platform. By clicking below to subscribe, you acknowledge that your information will be transferred to Mailchimp for processing. Learn more about Mailchimp's privacy practices.

  • English